Situation
The file relied on statements that appeared consistent until compared with timestamps and message records.
Cases
Criminal defence
Criminal defence through witness and timeline analysis
A case based on witness statements changed after objective timing data was reconstructed.
Strategy
We prepared a timeline, tested each statement against objective data and focused the hearing on reasonable doubt.
Outcome
The court found the evidence insufficient for conviction.
Legal core
The defence focused on whether the evidence met the criminal standard of proof once the statements were tested against objective records.
Matter approach
Timeline reconstruction
Each statement was placed against messages, timestamps and movement data.
Statement testing
We separated direct observation from assumption, hearsay and later interpretation.
Hearing focus
The defence concentrated the hearing on the gap between suspicion and proof.
What this case shows
Witness evidence must be tested against objective facts.
A clear timeline helps the court see doubt.
Defence strategy starts before the hearing.
Want your position assessed?
Book an intake